Friday, 8 January 2010
Boris Johnson's 'virements'
Virements
Apparently, it's what was required to fund the Story of London in June 2009: 'To approve a budget of £165,000 for the Story of London from the core GLA (greater London Authrity) budget, to make the appropriate budget virements and any other necessary budget adjustments.'
The new, online London Datastore (data.london.gov.uk) is promised to be a 'treasure trove of civic information' about London, launching officially on Jan 29. If you want to see the history of the Mayor's decisions since coming to office or even the population changes in Ealing and the City of London since 1881, it's a useful and sometimes interesting resource. Meanwhile, I'll keep making those virements to try to balance my own books.
Sunday, 11 October 2009
Free Rice.com
Be as smart as Stephen Fry, by knowing the definitions of obscure words and donating free rice through the UN World Food Program at www.freerice.com
Fraktur, Flabelliform, Katzenjammer, Cockalorum, Melilot, Propaedutic, Nullo, Grampus, Pung, Kop, Klieg, Asseverate, Scute, Entelechy, Kampong, Rial, Suttee, Lavolta, Piassava, Discerption, Partita, Pitchblende, Saury, Stromuhr...
Saturday, 10 October 2009
How to write right
* apostrophes with proper names/nouns ending in s that are singular, follow the rule of writing what is voiced, eg, Keats's poetry, Sobers's batting, The Times's style (or Times style); and with names where the final “s” is soft, use the “s” apostrophe, eg, Rabelais' writings, Delors' presidency; plurals follow normal form, as Lehman Brothers' loss etc
Note that with Greek names of more than one syllable that end in "s", generally do not use the apostrophe "s", eg, Aristophanes' plays, Achilles' heel, Socrates' life, Archimedes' principle; but note Jesus's (not Jesus') parables. Beware of organisations that have variations as their house style, eg, St Thomas' Hospital, where we must respect their preference. Also, take care with apostrophes with plural nouns, eg, women's, not womens'; children's, not childrens'; people's, not peoples'.
Use the apostrophe in expressions such as two years' time, several hours' delay etc.
An apostrophe should be used to indicate the plural of single letters - p's and q's
* management-speak do not succumb, for example, to describing an organisation as meaninglessly as what was suggested in a press release: "interested in non-face-to-face, high-volume, low-unit-cost solutions that would require the front-loaded investment the voluntary sector cannot acquire". See 'jargon'.
* News International Rupert Murdoch is chairman and chief executive of News Corporation (second mention, News Corp), a name changed in November 2004 from The News Corporation Limited after incorporation in the United States; it can be described as "parent company of The Times".
News Group Newspapers, another operating subsidiary of News International, is the publisher of The Sun and News of the World (and Sunday Magazine).
TSL Education Ltd (formerly Times Supplements Ltd) was another operating subsidiary of News International which published The Times Educational Supplement, The Times Higher Education Supplement, The Times Literary Supplement, Nursery World, TES College Manager and TES Primary magazine. Worldwide Learning Ltd, a subsidiary of TSL Education, is a provider of global distance learning solutions. The Times Literary Supplement is still owned by News International.
The Times Educational Supplement is now better known simply as the (l/c, roman) TES; what was The Times Higher Education Supplement is now Times Higher Education and branded as the (l/c, roman) THE. Both publications, with Nursery World and other publications, are still owned by TSL Education, but that company and its titles were bought from News International by Exponent Private Equity in 2005.
News Ltd is the Australian arm of News Corp.
Twentieth Century Fox (or 20th Century Fox in logo form), Fox News, Fox Sports etc are part of the Fox Entertainment Group, which is 82.1 per cent owned by News Corp.
Mr Murdoch does not "own" any of these companies, though his family is the largest single (though not majority) shareholder in News Corp. See BSkyB, Murdoch, Rupert, The Times
* BSkyB News Corporation, parent company of The Times, owns 39.1 per cent of BSkyB (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd). So use the formula: BSkyB, in which News Corporation, parent company of The Times, has a 39.1 per cent stake ... Sky can also be called an associate company of News International, or of News Corp. See News International, The Times
* Brummie (not Brummy), Geordie, Scouse etc, people and dialect, all capped. See Cockney
* breastfeed(ing) no longer use hyphen
* e-mail but note E-Stamp, a registered trademark; note e-commerce
* jellybean one word
* poppadum
* possessives do not use inelegant "geographic possessives" such as London's East End, Colorado's Breckenridge ski resort: write the East End of London, Breckenridge, the Colorado ski resort. Similarly, do not use the possessive in phrases such as BBC One's Panorama programme: write the BBC One Panorama programme, or simply Panorama on BBC One
and much, much more pedantry...
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
Great Fire of London - 2 Sep 1666
September 2, 1666: The Great Fire of London begins shortly after midnight. The fire burned for three days and decimated Old London inside the Roman Walls. By 1660, London was the largest city in Britain with ≈ 500,000 residents – more than the next 50 largest towns combined. Most of the houses were haphazardly placed and built of wood. The urban sprawl led to slums forming outside the old walled portion, The City. The City was bordered on the River Thames and covered 700 acres and 80,000 people lived there – about one-sixth of Londoners.
The City was the commercial heart of Greater London. It held the busiest port and was occupied by the working classes. The aristocrats lived in the countryside or further west, in the Westminster district, modern day West End. King Charles II's court was at Whitehall. The City itself was dirty, crowded, and rife with disease. The Plague Year of 1665 saw the bubonic plague spread through the mean streets. There was further tension between holdovers from the Civil War (1642-51) and the King.
The winding streets were narrow and although wood and thatch were prohibited, the materials were cheap and still in use. Several fires had already spread through London, the latest in 1632. The industry in the area also increased risk. Foundries, smithies, and glazeries flourished even though they, too, were banned because of potential fire hazard. The only connection between The City and the south side of the Thames was the London Bridge – and that was also built up with combustible materials.
The fire broke out on Sunday morning in Pudding Lane at the bakery owned by Thomas Farmer. Neighbours tried to put out the flames as the family climbed across roofs to safety. It was originally seen as no threat. By 7 AM, an easterly gale had turned the small local fire into a conflagration. By Wednesday, the winds fell and firebreaks contained the remaining small local fires. Deaths due directly to the fire were minimal, listed as eight. Many others died as secondary victims as they huddled in makeshift camps. Over 13,500 houses were burned along with 73 churches and St. Paul's Cathedral. Many businesses were also lost to the blaze. The price of the fire eventually came to around £10 million, or more than £1 billion today.
Source: www.examiner.com
Saturday, 1 August 2009
Rubicon Project offices - set of 24
Check out Jack Bauer's office (from the TV show 24) at 40 secs
into the video.
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
Waldo in the woods

"The torpid artist seeks inspiration at any cost, by virtue or by vice, by friend or by fiend, by prayer or by wine" Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-82), the transcendentalist preacher, philosopher and poet. Quote courtesy of my lunchtime smoked salmon bagel from Daily Bread ('By Appointment to Her Majesty The Queen, Maker of Quality Sandwiches'), supplier of sandwiches to The Times (and other fine papers, I'm sure).
Moral of the story: never look too closely at your sandwich wrapper (or you'll end up looking at Linda McCartney's vegetarian food website, interrogating Dictionary.com and generally wasting your lunch hour), nor take a rain-sodden walk through woods (like Waldo did) or you'll end up dying of pneumonia (like Waldo did...).
Dictionary.com: Torpid - inactive, sluggish, slow, dull, apathetic or lethargic.
Ralph Waldo Emerson: biography
Daily Bread: http://www.hain-celestial.co.uk/Thursday, 4 June 2009
Up The Workers!

Monday, 25 May 2009
Social Engineering

The answer is to make bad schools better
If you think social engineering is a myth, look no further than the admissions procedures used by a number of Britain’s top universities. Using information from the Department for Children, Schools and Families, the sinisterly named “DCSF standardisation measurement score”, universities such as Oxford and Durham are employing a points system to penalise entrants from the best state and private schools.
Social engineering well describes a system that uses a mathematical formula and GCSE results to provide applicants from poorer schools with a leg-up, handicapping those from good schools. Universities insist this is a fair way of spotting talented candidates who have been held back by poor teaching. Superficially it sounds reasonable – who can object to helping bright children from poor backgrounds? But there are deep flaws in this system. With the exception of Cambridge, universities have been slow to admit to using these methods. It has had to be dragged out of them. Yet students and parents have a right to know how their applications are being judged. The use of GCSE results also means many are being judged retrospectively. Having believed what mattered was A-levels, they now find the die was cast much earlier. Parents strive, rightly, to get their children into the best state schools. Others make huge sacrifices out of taxed income to pay for a first-class education. Now they find their sacrifices may have been in vain.
Not only is this wrong; it is tantamount to an admission that education policy has failed. As Chris Woodhead, the former chief inspector of schools, puts it: “The solution lies in the schools disadvantaged children attend. Labour has failed to raise standards in such schools and now wants us to believe that the problem is the elitism of our best universities.” It is not. Britain’s best universities are not so good that they can afford to be weakened. Social engineering is as bad for them as it is unfair for bright students who are being penalised for going to good schools. The government should instead concentrate on making bad schools better. That is the best way to serve the underprivileged.
* Click here for further reading from The Sunday Times 24 May 09, with additional formulae added for the online edition:
Top schools boycott ‘biased’ Durham. The leading university's entry system handicaps high performers
* The Cambridge GCSE formula is here
The answer is to make bad schools better
If you think social engineering is a myth, look no further than the admissions procedures used by a number of Britain’s top universities. Using information from the Department for Children, Schools and Families, the sinisterly named “DCSF standardisation measurement score”, universities such as Oxford and Durham are employing a points system to penalise entrants from the best state and private schools.
Social engineering well describes a system that uses a mathematical formula and GCSE results to provide applicants from poorer schools with a leg-up, handicapping those from good schools. Universities insist this is a fair way of spotting talented candidates who have been held back by poor teaching. Superficially it sounds reasonable – who can object to helping bright children from poor backgrounds? But there are deep flaws in this system. With the exception of Cambridge, universities have been slow to admit to using these methods. It has had to be dragged out of them. Yet students and parents have a right to know how their applications are being judged. The use of GCSE results also means many are being judged retrospectively. Having believed what mattered was A-levels, they now find the die was cast much earlier. Parents strive, rightly, to get their children into the best state schools. Others make huge sacrifices out of taxed income to pay for a first-class education. Now they find their sacrifices may have been in vain.
Not only is this wrong; it is tantamount to an admission that education policy has failed. As Chris Woodhead, the former chief inspector of schools, puts it: “The solution lies in the schools disadvantaged children attend. Labour has failed to raise standards in such schools and now wants us to believe that the problem is the elitism of our best universities.” It is not. Britain’s best universities are not so good that they can afford to be weakened. Social engineering is as bad for them as it is unfair for bright students who are being penalised for going to good schools. The government should instead concentrate on making bad schools better. That is the best way to serve the underprivileged.
* Click here for further reading from The Sunday Times 24 May 09, with additional formulae added for the online edition:
Top schools boycott ‘biased’ Durham. The leading university's entry system handicaps high performers
* The Cambridge GCSE formula is here
Thursday, 21 May 2009
Victorious Gurkhas - VG Day

Monday, 18 May 2009
Plasticine Paradise
Saturday, 2 May 2009
The future of newspapers?

Thursday, 23 April 2009
St George's Day

Wednesday, 1 April 2009
Financial (April) Fools' Day


Sunday, 22 March 2009
Refreshment Day for Mothers


Saturday, 21 March 2009
Google Street View


Saturday, 14 March 2009
Foxtrot Oscar, TA






